The U.S. municipal solid waste management market is projected to record a substantial growth rate over the coming years owing to the rising demand for effective & sustainable waste treatment practices. Municipal solid waste comprises daily items of use like appliances, batteries, clothing, product packaging, furniture, food scraps, newspapers, paint, bottles, and grass clippings.

This type of waste generally comes from businesses, homes, hospitals, and schools. Practices like composting, waste prevention, and recycling would further reduce the amount of waste which is required to be disposed.

Waste prevention is designing products so as to decrease the amount of waste that is to be thrown away later and also to make the resulting waste a less toxic for the environment. Composting comprises collecting the organic waste like yard trimmings and food scraps, and to store them under conditions which would help it naturally break down. The byproduct of composting further can be utilized as a natural fertilizer.

Recycling is the retrieval of useful materials like metals, paper, plastic, and glass from garbage in order to generate new products, thus lessening the amount of virgin raw material required. These practices would help in controlling and managing the municipal solid waste.

Request sample copy of this report @ https://www.decresearch.com/request-sample/detail/2953

U.S. municipal solid waste management market is segmented in terms of source, treatment, material, and regional landscape.

With respect to source, the U.S. municipal solid waste management market is divided into commercial and residential. Rapid increase in the regional population will drive the residential MSW management statistics. Meanwhile, ongoing investments across service sector industry will proliferate the business outlook for the commercial segment.

Based on treatment, the U.S. MSW management market is classified into disposal and open dumping. Growing concerns towards sustainable waste management practices will surge the disposal solid waste management revenue in the U.S.

In terms of material, the overall U.S. municipal solid waste management market is bifurcated into textiles, yard trimmings, plastics, wood, metals, food, paper & paperboard, and others. The others segment includes leather, rubber, and glass waste.

Municipal solid waste management market from plastics across the U.S. will witness substantial surge on account of growing environmental concerns associated with improper disposal of these wastes. Increasing construction and demolition debris will drive the market size for wood waste management in the U.S.

Make Inquiry about this report @ https://www.decresearch.com/inquiry-before-buying/2953

Textile solid waste management industry is anticipated to witness substantial growth in the U.S. with increasing focus toward fabric reprocessing.

From a regional frame of reference, growing focus towards development of sustainable waste management practices will drive the industry outlook in East North Central region. The West South Central region will witness growth due to a well-established tourism industry in the region, mainly in Texas, driving the MSW management market.

Growing investments in the real estate sector will spur the South Atlantic regional market in coming years.

Ongoing focus towards recycling of various solid trash will increase the industry size in the East South-Central region. Stringent governmental measures to effectively dispose the harmful solid trash will drive the market demand in the West North Central region.

Chapter 1 Methodology & Scope

• 1.1 Methodology
• 1.2 Market definitions
• 1.3 Market estimation & forecast parameters
  • 1.3.1 COVID - 19 impact on market outlook
• 1.4 Data Sources
  • 1.4.1 Primary
  • 1.4.2 Secondary
    • 1.4.2.1 Paid Sources
    • 1.4.2.2 Public Sources

Chapter 2 Executive Summary

• 2.1 U.S. municipal solid waste management market 360 degree synopsis, 2015 - 2026
  • 2.1.1 Business trends
  • 2.1.2 Source trends
  • 2.1.3 Treatment trends
  • 2.1.4 Material trends
  • 2.1.5 Regional trends

Chapter 3 U.S. Municipal Solid Waste Management Industry Insights

• 3.1 Industry segmentation
• 3.2 Industry landscape, 2015 - 2026 (USD Million)
• 3.3 Industry ecosystem analysis
  • 3.3.1 Vendor Matrix
• 3.4 Innovation and sustainability
  • 3.4.1 Suez Environnement
  • 3.4.2 Covanta Corporation
  • 3.4.3 Wheelabrator Technologies
  • 3.4.4 Clean Harbors
  • 3.4.5 Waste Management, Inc
  • 3.4.6 Veolia
  • 3.4.7 CP Group
• 3.5 Regulatory landscape
  • 3.5.1 Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA)
  • 3.5.2 Solid Waste Disposal Act of 1965
  • 3.5.3 Resource Recovery Act of 1970
  • 3.5.4 Federal Regulations
    • 3.5.4.1 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
      • 3.5.4.1.1 42 U.S.C. §6901 et seq. (1976)
      • 3.5.4.1.2 Federal Facility Compliance Act of 1992
      • 3.5.4.1.3 Land Disposal Program Flexibility Act of 1996
  • 3.5.5 State Regulations
    • 3.5.5.1 Alabama
      • 3.5.5.1.1 Alabama Act
      • 3.5.5.1.2 Solid Wates and Recyclable Materials Management Act (SWRMMA)
    • 3.5.5.2 California
      • 3.5.5.2.1 California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery
      • 3.5.5.2.2 Senate Bill
      • 3.5.5.2.3 SABRC
    • 3.5.5.3 Connecticut
      • 3.5.5.3.1 CTDEEP
    • 3.5.5.4 Delaware
      • 3.5.5.4.1 Delaware Solid Waste Authority (DSWA)
      • 3.5.5.4.2 Statewide Solid Waste Management Plan (SSWMP)
      • 3.5.5.4.3 Environmental Regulation of MSW
      • 3.5.5.4.4 Differential Disposal Fee Program (DDFP)
      • 3.5.5.4.5 Recycle Delaware
      • 3.5.5.4.6 Curbside Recycling Program
    • 3.5.5.5 Indiana
      • 3.5.5.5.1 Indiana Recycling Coalition
    • 3.5.5.6 North Carolina
      • 3.5.5.6.1 Scrap Tire Management Program
      • 3.5.5.6.2 White Goods Management Program
      • 3.5.5.6.3 Abandoned Manufactured Homes (AMH) Program
    • 3.5.5.7 Michigan
      • 3.5.5.7.1 Solid Waste Policy 2017
      • 3.5.5.7.2 Environmental Protection Act
      • 3.5.5.7.3 Recycling Initiative
    • 3.5.5.8 Nevada
      • 3.5.5.8.1 Solid Waste Management Plan
    • 3.5.5.9 Ohio
      • 3.5.5.9.1 Ohio House Bill 592 (HB 592)
      • 3.5.5.9.2 State Solid Waste Management Plan
    • 3.5.5.10 Minnesota
      • 3.5.5.10.1 Minnesota Waste Management Act
      • 3.5.5.10.2 Minnesota Electronics Recycling Act
    • 3.5.5.11 Arkansas
    • 3.5.5.12 Louisiana
    • 3.5.5.13 Texas
    • 3.5.5.14 Florida
      • 3.5.5.14.1 Florida Rules Related to Recycling
      • 3.5.5.14.2 Florida Statutes Regarding Recycling
    • 3.5.5.15 Wisconsin
    • 3.5.5.16 Illinois
      • 3.5.5.16.1 Solid Waste Management Act (415 ILCS 20/1 et seq.)
      • 3.5.5.16.2 Solid Waste Planning and Recycling Act (415 ILCS 15/1 et seq.)
      • 3.5.5.16.3 Environmental Protection Act (415 ILCS 5/1 et seq.)
      • 3.5.5.16.4 Mercury Thermostat Collection Act (415 ILCS 98/1 et seq.)
      • 3.5.5.16.5 Solid Waste Planning and Recycling Act
    • 3.5.5.17 Kansas
      • 3.5.5.17.1 Kansas Solid Waste Management Plan
    • 3.5.5.18 New Jersey
      • 3.5.5.18.1 Statewide Mandatory Source Separation and Recycling Act
    • 3.5.5.19 Pennsylvania
      • 3.5.5.19.1 Municipal Waste Planning, Recycling and Waste Reduction Act
• 3.6 U.S. landfill gate fee
• 3.7 MSW generation & household spending analysis
• 3.8 COVID - 19 impact on the overall industry outlook, 2020- 2026
  • 3.8.1 Optimistic view
  • 3.8.2 Realistic view
  • 3.8.3 Pessimistic view
• 3.9 Household waste sorting practices
  • 3.9.1 U.S.
• 3.10 Detailed overview on bin sorting and handling technologies
  • 3.10.1 Selection of Technology
  • 3.10.2 Waste sorting processes & technologies
• 3.11 Industry impact forces
  • 3.11.1 Growth drivers
    • 3.11.1.1 Innovative waste management practices
    • 3.11.1.2 Continuous economic growth & expanding commercial sector base
    • 3.11.1.3 Rising population
  • 3.11.2 Industry pitfalls & challenges
    • 3.11.2.1 Lack of investments along with availability of an effective SWM regulatory framework
• 3.12 Porter's analysis
• 3.13 Competitive landscape, 2019
  • 3.13.1 Strategy dashboard
    • 3.13.1.1 Waste Connections
    • 3.13.1.2 Hitachi Zosen Corporation
    • 3.13.1.3 Stericycle, Inc.
    • 3.13.1.4 CP Group
    • 3.13.1.5 Suez Environnement
    • 3.13.1.6 Covanta Holding Corporation
    • 3.13.1.7 Clean Harbors
    • 3.13.1.8 Veolia
    • 3.13.1.9 Advanced Disposal Services
    • 3.13.1.10 Waste Management, Inc.
• 3.14 PESTEL analysis